Skip to main content

Posts

Three Women, Three Statements, And Bailey’s Guilt - How we knew he did it

  It is almost two years since Ian Bailey, dressed like a tramp, died in a gutter.  Soon the result of the cold case review of the murder of Sophie Toscan du Plantier will be known. Independent experts agree that the French court's guilty verdict was correct. Below is a version of the introduction in Case Closed: Ian Bailey and the Murder of Sophie Toscan du Plantier. It shows how just three separate corroborated statements by three women demonstrate Bailey's guilt. Avaiable on Amazon.ie and Amazon.co.uk Introduction: Three Women, Three Statements and Bailey’s Guilt  An objective and reasoned evaluation of the evidence can lead only to that conclusion. In this book, you will learn about dozens of police statements concerning the murder of Sophie Toscan du Plantier that have been unknown to most people for over 25 years. They will reveal why An Garda Síochána knew they had a very strong case against Ian Bailey. The statements will help people to understand why Ian Bailey...
Recent posts

Jim Sheridan, Ian Bailey and Cassandra Voices

  Jim Sheridan, Ian Bailey and Cassandra Voices 1.       Introduction In the Cassandra Voices interview with Jim Sheridan , he discusses the relationship he developed with Ian Bailey , who was rightly found guilty in absentia of the 1996 murder of Sophie Toscan du Plantier.  The interview offers insights into the way Sheridan thinks. It shows us why, while the thinking process may contribute to his award-winning movies, it is not conducive to investigating this crime. 2.       Where I agree with Jim One issue where I am in full agreement with Jim Sheridan is that Bailey could not unequivocally prove he did not murder Sophie. In law, Bailey was never obliged to prove he did not do it. However, had he had an alibi this matter would have been settled decades ago. Initially, he had an alibi, a false alibi, supported by Jules Thomas. A false alibi is a lie or series of lies told to the Police to deceive them into believ...

NEMESIS - How the truths of Jules Thomas expose the the lies of Ian Bailey

This is a copy of the full 32 page document illustrating how Jules Thomas and others have independently and resolutely stuck to a story of what happened on the early afternoon of December 23rd 1996. This narrative was corroborated by Ian Bailey in 1996 and 1997. The narrative shows us that Bailey knew far more about the victim and the crime than he has admitted to. Furthermore what he knew could only have been known by someone involved in the crime. It also reveals how Bailey has tried to cover up his involvement. He has failed. #