This is a copy of the full 32 page document illustrating how Jules Thomas and others have independently and resolutely stuck to a story of what happened on the early afternoon of December 23rd 1996. This narrative was corroborated by Ian Bailey in 1996 and 1997. The narrative shows us that Bailey knew far more about the victim and the crime than he has admitted to. Furthermore what he knew could only have been known by someone involved in the crime. It also reveals how Bailey has tried to cover up his involvement. He has failed.
![]() |
































Comments
Post a Comment